Your cart is empty

There are 3 types of Duty of Candour, two are optional/Best Practice, and one requires reporting


Basic Principles

In simple terms, this is a duty for organisations to be honest and open with people in their care when things go wrong.

When mistakes are made, especially the more serious ones, fear of consequences drives the natural urge to hide things and cover up, to avoid bad consequences. With staff, this is often the fear of losing their job and reputation among fellow staff, and for organisations it may be the fear of bad publicity, loss of contracts, and regulatory action.

To err is human, everyone makes mistakes. A culture of openness and a blame free culture becomes a learning opportunity and makes staff more confident in admitting mistakes and working to improve systems and processes.


Open disclosure

When an incident of concern occurs, there should be transparency and openness in disclosing this to the person, their family and maybe other stakeholders in the fullest terms possible. This would take the form of what happened; how we handled it; how we protected the person; and prevention measures.

Conflicts can occur with data protections requirements and breach of confidentiality, and it is important to exercise care in disclosing any confidential or sensitive information, particularly medical information.

An apology is not an admission of fault and goes a long way to reducing tensions and promoting trust in the relationship.


Statutory Vs Professional

There are two types of Duty of Candour

  1. Statutory: This is the legal requirement to report serious and untoward incidents, such as death and severe harm and clearly specified in the regulation. This has a higher threshold and is appropriate only where serious harm has occurred
  2. Professional/Ethical: Most professional bodies have set out codes of conduct that any incident should be subject to a Duty of Candour, even if it has not resulted in serious harm. This has a much lower threshold, and covers any unexpected incident that is of concern or causes harm or distress

Professional codes of conduct

Some of the organisation that have set a code of conduct on Duty of Candour

  1. General Medical Council
  2. General Pharmaceutical Council
  3. General Dental Council
  4. General Optical Council
  5. Social work England
  6. Nursing and Midwifery Council
  7. Health & Care Professions Council

The Health & Care Professions Council covers a range of members, not necessarily bound by CQC Regulations, including Scientists, Paramedics; Psychologists, Therapists, all of whom follow similar standards.


Duty of candour - Best Practice

Professional & Ethical codes of conduct have set a high standard of best practice and established a common standard amongst professional bodies.

All Providers whether in Healthcare or Adult Social Care setting have the same common duty of care towards people in their care and obliged to seek out best practice in care from all professions.

CQC Guidelines make specific reference that Providers must follow best practice, and therefore adopting "Professional & Ethical Duty of Candour" in effect can be seen as a requirement to comply with KLOEs.

The core purpose of Duty of Candour

The intention of the duty of candour legislation is to ensure that providers are open and transparent with people who use services. It sets out some specific requirements providers must follow when things go wrong with care and treatment, including informing people about the incident, providing reasonable support, providing truthful information and an apology when things go wrong.


Notifiable Incident – criteria

A notifiable safety incident must meet all 3 of the following criteria:

  1. It must have been unintended or unexpected.
  2. It must have occurred during the provision of a regulated activity
  3. In the reasonable opinion of a healthcare professional, already has, or might, result in death, or severe or moderate harm to the person receiving care.

Even if something does not qualify as a notifiable safety incident, there is always an overarching duty of candour to be open and transparent with people using services.


Notifiable safety incident – Health Service Body

A health service body is an NHS Trust or NHS Foundation Trust

The incident: Any unintended or unexpected incident in respect of a service user during the provision of a regulated activity that, could or appears to have resulted in Service user suffering any of these below:

  1. Death as a result of the incident, or
  2. Severe harm, moderate harm or prolonged psychological harm to the service user

Notifiable safety incident – Other Services

Any unintended or unexpected incident that appears to have resulted in the Service user suffering any of these below:

  • Death as a result of the incident
  • Impairment of the sensory, motor or intellectual functions, which has or likely to last, for a continuous period of at least 28 days
  • Changes to the structure of the service user's body
  • Prolonged pain or prolonged psychological harm
  • Shortening of the life expectancy of the service user

Or, where the Service User requires treatment by a health care professional in order to prevent:

  • Death of the service user, or
  • Any injury which, if left untreated, would lead to one or more of the outcomes mentioned above

Definition of Harm

Moderate harm:
Harm that requires a moderate increase in treatment and significant, but not permanent, harm.

Severe harm:
A permanent lessening of bodily, sensory, motor, physiologic or intellectual functions, including removal of the wrong limb or organ or brain damage, that is related directly to the incident and not related to the natural course of the service user's illness or underlying condition.

Moderate increase in treatment:
An unplanned return to surgery, an unplanned re-admission, a prolonged episode of care, extra time in hospital or as an outpatient, cancelling of treatment, or transfer to another treatment area (such as intensive care)

Prolonged pain:
Pain which a service user has experienced, or is likely to experience, for a continuous period of at least 28 days.

Prolonged psychological harm:
Psychological harm which a service user has experienced, or is likely to experience, for a continuous period of at least 28 days.


Reporting an Incident

  • You must act promptly
  • You must liaise with the person harmed or someone acting for them
  • Support the persons harmed and those who act for them
  • Involve family members if consent is given
  • Keep detailed records of actions and outcomes

NOTE: There are specific procedures to follow depending on the type of incident being reported


  • The obligations associated with the statutory duty of candour are contained in regulation 20 of The Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014.
  • It is imposed on the organisation, not on individuals and it is a criminal offence if you don't comply.

The key principles:

  1. Care organisations have a general duty to act in an open and transparent way in relation to care provided to persons. This means that an open and honest culture must exist throughout an organisation.
  2. The statutory duty applies to organisations, not individuals, though it is clear from CQC guidance that it is expected that an organisation's staff cooperate with it to ensure the obligation is met.
  3. As soon as is reasonably practicable after a notifiable care safety incident occurs, the organisation must tell the person (or their representative) about it in person.
  4. The organisation has to give the person a full explanation of what is known at the time, including what further enquiries will be carried out. Organisations must also provide an apology and keep a written record of the notification to the person.
  5. A notifiable safety incident has a specific statutory meaning
  6. There is a statutory duty to provide reasonable support to the person. Reasonable support could be providing an interpreter to ensure discussions are understood, or giving emotional support to the person following a notifiable safety incident.
  7. Once the they have been told in person about the notifiable safety incident, the organisation must provide them with a written note of the discussion, and copies of correspondence must be kept.

Members of Professional Bodies

If you are a member of a professional body, this might affect you both as an individual and your organisation as a whole. You may be accountable to your body as a member and your organisation responsible to the regulatory body.

Don't just focus on policies
Inspectors typically spend less than 5 minutes on your policies, the rest of the day is spent on looking for evidence of what actually happens every day.

"Usually I don't bother with policies, might look at Safeguarding"

Comment by a CQC inspector - April 2018


Customisation is expensive

Customisation means you get things setup exactly as you like it. However, this takes up time, and it means you are the permanently tied to managing this yourself

A typical example is a policies system that costs only £200 for over 600 policies and documents.

  • Most managers end up spending over £12,500 in time and effort to review and customise
  • Customisation is to that one Manager's preference, and quality can be variable
  • When a new Manager starts it makes more sense to scrap the old and start all over again
  • It becomes a mammoth task if you fall behind in upgrades

Setup Time and Effort

The time and effort you will put into the system is more significant than the cost of the system itself.
Consider the following when purchasing the system:

  1. The time it will take to initially learn and set up the system
  2. The time you will spend reading and understanding all the documentation
  3. The time and effort it will take to implement and get the system running
  4. The ongoing monitoring and management to ensure compliance with the system
  5. The maintenance and upkeep required for the system

Keep in mind that, on average, implementing a system can cost five to ten times more than the cost of the software or system itself.


Futureproof systems

Don't just get a system specifically for CQC.
CQC has gone through several major changes and more keep coming every year, your system will be out of date virtually every year.

You should look for systems based on National Standards and accepted best practice rather than the latest list of prompts.
Core standards of the industry do not actually change that much, they evolve slowly. A system that follows core standards will remain future proof for many years.

Any decent compliance system should be able to cope with regular changes, without any upheaval or changes in the way you work.
A good acid test is to ask what happens if new and completely revamped KLOEs come in time after time, and whether that means you have to reorganise or do anything differently.

The only change worth making is to keep simplifying everything


Approach to Compliance

Our approach to compliance should be:-

  1. Prevention at the frontline
  2. Make staff self-sufficient, to release management time
  3. Learn and improve as you do
  4. Risk based compliance
  5. Measure it, then improve it

Keep everything simple so everyone understands the principles


What to look for in Compliance software

Compliance software should be designed to help you carry out the task, instead of being one more thing to do.
It should automatically generate evidence that you are following a quality assured process every single day.
What a good system should produce:-

  1. Evidence of tasks carried out
  2. Logs and reports
  3. Evidence of monitoring
  4. Proof of good practice and leadership
  5. Evidence of awareness and adherence to the rules
  6. Management of risk and potential harm

SOLE TRADERS TO ENTERPRISES

Scalable solutions suitable for Providers of any size and trusted by well known brand names

customers NHS Nottingham Trust
customers ambient
customers livability
customers london medical
customers nuffield
customers qinetic
customers pearl chemist
customers renovo
customers ucl
customers vision
customers Berkshire Primary Care
customers Care at home
customers Circle health group
customers Cromwell hospital
customers Cygnet healthcare
customers NHS Halcyon Medical
customers NHS South West Yorkshire
customers NHS Torbay and south devon
customers North Hampshire urgent care
customers Nuffield health
customers Priory
customers Spire Bushy hospital
customers Trust Care Ltd
customers Urgent care Primary care 25
customers Winfield hospital
×

Login to your account

Don't have an account? Register Now